4 ms·
The general idea has various problems. For example, would newspapers or accounts of things/people, in various media, of objectively public information be requir
by richardbarosky 6y ago
The general idea has various problems. For example, would newspapers or accounts of things/people, in various media, of objectively public information be required to be retroactively removed from any mention? Does it make sense to force and dictate what entities/individuals can do with basic information at the discretion of anyone who doesn't like it? Just a few thoughts. The records exist in the database because they are public information. If a record is removed from public view, that's done when requested because it's the right thing to do, although there is no strict legal obligation to do so.
- colejohnson66 6y agoHow does Europe’s “right to be forgotten” handle it?
- richardbarosky 6y agoNot sure. Maybe if someone doesn't like the Google search results, they make a complaint, and Google has to do what they want. There are many other public records databases that have similar data, including the federdal judiciary and many state courts across the country. Some are listed on the info page: https://www.judyrecords.com/info https://www.judyrecords.com/info