I take issue with your use of "prove a negative". http://departments.bloomu.edu/philosophy/pages/content/hales/articlepdf/proveanegative.pdf http://departments.

I take issue with your use of "prove a negative". http://departments.bloomu.edu/philosophy/pages/content/hales/articlepdf/proveanegative.pdf http://departments.bloomu.edu/philosophy/pages/content/hales... The Problem of Induction is something different. Let's all just be good Bayesians now and drop the argument of what is proof, what is evidence, what are tenable beliefs given X evidence, etc. It's a solved issue if anyone cares about being correct.