4 ms·
>Without content creators Without content creators who refuse to allow ads in exchange for free hosting, is it nothing? Probably not, most creators do enjoy ma
by ApolloFortyNine 6y ago
>Without content creators
Without content creators who refuse to allow ads in exchange for free hosting, is it nothing? Probably not, most creators do enjoy making money, and most of the ones putting out content for free, but without ads, will struggle to find a competitor who will indefinitely provide free hosting.
>4-5 billion dollars per quarter
In revenue, not profit. Very, very important distinction.
- moogly 6y agoI mean... you take the good with the bad to get the breadth and depth in your platform. You make a shitload of money on PewDiePie and nothing on Mieleman (sorry; I forget the name of the German guy who posts videos of washing machine cycles), and balance the two. It's not difficult. ~~Okay then, 15 billion in profits last year. I'm no businessman but to me that's pretty damn good profits with those revenue numbers.~~ Edit: Alright, Google search failed me. Searching for profits gave me revenue. Sorry about that. Profits are still secret, it seems. But the hosting costs won't eat the lion's share of that, I can assure you.
- ApolloFortyNine 6y ago...again my friend, that is the revenue number. Searching Youtube revenue 2019 gives you exactly that number.
- ApolloFortyNine 6y agohttps://www.theverge.com/2020/2/4/21121370/youtube-advertising-revenue-creators-demonetization-earnings-google https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/4/21121370/youtube-advertisi... Well according to this $8.5 billion of that is given to creators. Leaving 6.5 billion for hosting costs, development, and all the management that goes with a platform of that size. About 2.8 billion hours were spent watching youtube in 2019.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]