4 ms·
> In these situations all I want to say is "Who cares". This list has a second hidden benefit: Typically, I find that those who have very lightweight pages hav
by Shared404 6y ago
> In these situations all I want to say is "Who cares".
This list has a second hidden benefit: Typically, I find that those who have very lightweight pages have more interesting things to say.
That being said, that's not a hard and fast rule, as I both have a lightweight page, and not much that's interesting to say.
- ffpip 6y agoThis is also true for how the site 'looks'. The less flashier, the more interesting the content might be to read. They don't bother about SEO/clicks
- SulfurHexaFluri 6y agoThe best content is always on some boomers custom made forum software from 2009 that they use to post in depth articles about obscure topics.
- geodel 6y agoAgreed. Not a general rule but as a rule of thumb it works very well.
- bnchrch 6y agoThis feels like both an anecdote and a straw man. I can point to two blogs on either side that have a lot to offer. Large bundle: https://www.joshwcomeau.com/ https://www.joshwcomeau.com/ Small Bundle: https://www.eugenewei.com/ https://www.eugenewei.com/
- Shared404 6y ago> This feels like both an anecdote Definitely. This is just something I've noticed. > and a straw man. Wait what? I was just bringing up something I've noticed. How is this a straw man? As I said before, this is by no means a firm rule, just something that I noticed is frequently the case. PS. Thanks for linking those blog's, I've added both to my reading list.