3 ms·
Remember that your code needs to account for the possibility of a negative leap second, meaning if you're using epoch time for timestamps you could have an inst
by revicon 6y ago
Remember that your code needs to account for the possibility of a negative leap second, meaning if you're using epoch time for timestamps you could have an instance that an event that happened after a previous one could be stamped as having happened before it instead.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second
Edit: Actually I was slightly wrong, in the event of a leap second, we would repeat the same second twice.
- forgotmypw17 6y agoThank you for the heads-up! I try to write code loose enough that this would not be a problem. :)