6 ms·
Well I think it's safe to assume that the author believes marriage to exist for the purpose of creating a family (or progeny as he puts it), so he's not solely
by knolax 6y ago
Well I think it's safe to assume that the author believes marriage to exist for the purpose of creating a family (or progeny as he puts it), so he's not solely opposed to gay marriage the legal institution, but gay marriage for the purpose of creating a family.
- asguy 6y agoThe author was positing a question. You cut off the very next sentence: > But if it's just to "be happy with the person you love?" Then why not?