4 ms·
Let's assume the situation were reversed. Do you think the pundits would stick to the "No, fraud is not widespread and there is no evidence" mantra? Or, do you
by BitwiseFool 6y ago
Let's assume the situation were reversed. Do you think the pundits would stick to the "No, fraud is not widespread and there is no evidence" mantra? Or, do you think the anomalies presented would be scrutinized with the precision of an electron microscope?
- datalist 6y agoThat's not the point though. The question really only is whether the allegations have mentioned merit or not. If the situation was reversed it would be the same of course.