3 ms·
The complete opposite is true for me. HTML should be as clean and simplistic as possible, which is why it makes sense to me write HAML instead of HTML for .rb
by shawnee_ 15y ago
The complete opposite is true for me. HTML should be as clean and simplistic as possible, which is why it makes sense to me write HAML instead of HTML for .rb
CSS, however, is the fun where the true art of front-end design happens, so I think it's fun to play with a forgiving syntax.
- masklinn 15y ago> CSS, however, is the fun where the true art of front-end design happens, so I think it's fun to play with a forgiving syntax. It's fun to play with a forgiving syntax, but it's no fun saying the same thing 50 times. That's why I like LessCSS (more than SASS anyway): LessCSS just feels like future CSS, a better CSS. Not something different, not something complex (it adds 4 basic features to CSS), it's a simple mechanical transformation and the output is easy to predict (I'm not fond of the &-combinator, but that's about the only criticism I have for it).