3 ms·
This is all true. The question, however, is: given that all these companies are already on the brink of bankruptcy, how is it legal (and acceptable) that a 3r
by beagle3 6y ago
This is all true.
The question, however, is: given that all these companies are already on the brink of bankruptcy, how is it legal (and acceptable) that a 3rd party comes in, extracts hundreds of millions from the already bankrupt company, and when the bankruptcy does arrive, it is bigger and worse than what would have happened without the PE involvement? Basically everyone except the PE gets screwed.
I have not been following this closely, but if the 5-10 PE deals I’ve looked at over the years, it was clear from day 1 whether it was structured to have a chance at recovery, (some of which succeed, and some fail) or just to enrich the PE buyer.
I wonder why this isn’t clear to the creditors - my guess would be that an early legitimate creditor only uses “other peoples money”, which legitimizes it for others.
- lmm 6y agoOften a PE buyout is a bankruptcy, or a last-ditch alternative to one. Breaking the company down for parts is often what the creditors want, explicitly or otherwise, and the PE firm is just being paid to execute it. (There are definitely cases where one creditor arranges things to screw over another - but again I think blaming the PE firm for that is misplaced.) They have their share of failures like any other industry, but IME Hanlon's Razor - or just legitimate risk-taking that doesn't pan out - applies to most PE bankruptcies.