> Apple chose #2, which is best for customers, and got forced to pay $113M from it. It's ridiculous. You're missing out the part where they did not inform the

> Apple chose #2, which is best for customers, and got forced to pay $113M from it. It's ridiculous. You're missing out the part where they did not inform the user why their device was being throttled and nor did their internal tooling inform the genius that a simple battery change can fix the issue.