4 ms·
Regarding your last option, I respectfully disagree that it's the best option. It is likely that an 'existing startup company' has already found it's co-founde
by DevX101 15y ago
Regarding your last option, I respectfully disagree that it's the best option. It is likely that an 'existing startup company' has already found it's co-founders, and a new hire will probably be coming on as an employee.
I think the risk/reward ratio are unfavorable for early EMPLOYEES in a vast majority of the cases.
- ares2012 15y agoThat is true, but working at a start up for 2-3 years you will meet all the other employees that work at the start up company. It's those people (not the founders of the existing company) that are fertile ground for starting your own company. It does require a few years of time investment but most of the start up founder teams I know started this way.