4 ms·
That article proves the opposite point, despite the intense message-warping attempted. The report in question is a hypothetical "what if" scenario analysis (on
by elefanten 6y ago
That article proves the opposite point, despite the intense message-warping attempted.
The report in question is a hypothetical "what if" scenario analysis (one of many) that outlines one possible strategy to address a future where US corporate innovation is not in the top tier. It's not real and it's speculative about the medium-to-long term future.
Despite falling over itself to try to imply the US might actually be guilty of trade secret theft for corporations... it fails to provide a single example.
- cambalache 6y agoYeah, you are right I am sure the NSA/CIA will let us know when they decide to do it.
- jonnybgood 6y agoIn all the leaked documents is there any indication, even the slightest, such a thing is being done?
- nyolfen 6y agoI am easily as aware of the activities of US intelligence SIGINT programs as nearly any civilian on this site, and just as reflexively critical of them as you would expect of a HN poster (my interest stems from my opposition), but I have never seen any indication of industrial espionage on behalf of American businesses à la China in at least the post-Church committee period. If you make a strong claim, you should be able to support it with evidence.