2 ms·
No need for the snark. The part that was puzzling me is clarified by the courts evidently not being involved yet.
by bigbubba 6y ago
No need for the snark. The part that was puzzling me is clarified by the courts evidently not being involved yet.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> No need for the snark. I'm not being snarky. Legal representatives never have any power whatsoever, whether courts are involved or not, to make you do anything. Only a court has the power to do that.
- lb7000 6y ago>Do you think there's some kind of law that says you have to respond to someone's legal representatives? >Which law do you think that is? Answering with 2 belittling questions is clearly inflamatory. >Legal representatives never have any power whatsoever, whether courts are involved or not, to make you do anything. Only a court has the power to do that. This response after being called out for being snarky would have been a fine original response.