3 ms·
What's missing from those links is that this was clearly a bug and was already fixed. This just surfaces in cycles from bloggers who can't be bothered to check
by afrcnc 6y ago
What's missing from those links is that this was clearly a bug and was already fixed. This just surfaces in cycles from bloggers who can't be bothered to check their articles for outdated info.
- magicalist 6y agoFrom deep in one of those previous threads, the fix was https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f800edbd1b50ecc13a0d3391f5f45ba9c84625be%5E%21/ https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/f800edb...
- _qulr 6y agoIt appears to be only partly fixed: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25144791 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25144791
- reaperducer 6y agobloggers who can't be bothered to check their articles for outdated info. Accurate, timely information doesn't generate clicks. Outrage pays. These days it seems like 70% of the links on HN are rando bloggers trying to make tech nerds angry for fun and profit.
- bgdam 6y agoIsn't this just partially fixed? I believe google.com cookies are still exempt in the current latest release.