> especially when even the authors themselves seem to be okay with blocking child pornography sites. ...are you not? Like, I get your "moral relativism" argume

> especially when even the authors themselves seem to be okay with blocking child pornography sites. ...are you not? Like, I get your "moral relativism" argument, but I don't think anyone besides "extra-principled" libertarians would think there is some hypocrisy between advocating against the censorship of news/political ideas and literal child abuse.