3 ms·
The article says Disney has ignored his legal representatives. I don't know how that's possible, but it's what the article says.
by bigbubba 6y ago
The article says Disney has ignored his legal representatives. I don't know how that's possible, but it's what the article says.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- zamalek 6y agoFailure to appear in court is sometimes a ruling in favor of the plaintiff. He could go ahead and file the lawsuit.
- AnimalMuppet 6y agoIt means they haven't yet filed a court case. If you ignore the other side once they file, the courts tend to impose very real consequences.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> The article says Disney has ignored his legal representatives. I don't know how that's possible Do you think there's some kind of law that says you have to respond to someone's legal representatives? Which law do you think that is?
- bigbubba 6y agoNo need for the snark. The part that was puzzling me is clarified by the courts evidently not being involved yet.
- chrisseaton 6y ago> No need for the snark. I'm not being snarky. Legal representatives never have any power whatsoever, whether courts are involved or not, to make you do anything. Only a court has the power to do that.
- lb7000 6y ago>Do you think there's some kind of law that says you have to respond to someone's legal representatives? >Which law do you think that is? Answering with 2 belittling questions is clearly inflamatory. >Legal representatives never have any power whatsoever, whether courts are involved or not, to make you do anything. Only a court has the power to do that. This response after being called out for being snarky would have been a fine original response.