3 ms·
"state censorship" at least in The USA, is pretty limited. So yes, I would prefer the existing system, where state censorship is extremely limited, to a situat
by stale2002 6y ago
"state censorship" at least in The USA, is pretty limited.
So yes, I would prefer the existing system, where state censorship is extremely limited, to a situation where instead censorship is much more broad and effects more people.
If the speech is legal, then it should be allowed on major communication platforms.
There is even existing laws for this, that we could expand to cover new forms of media.
Those existing laws are called common carrier laws, and they currently apply to the phone network, and they could be changed to include many of the major new platforms.
Common carrier laws are pretty uncontroversial. I would hope that you do not think as they apply to the phone system, that they are some huge example of unfairness.