4 ms·
> Once it is fully evaporated, you still need to account for the information that was contained within (or accept information loss). One way to escape this is:
by seppel 6y ago
> Once it is fully evaporated, you still need to account for the information that was contained within (or accept information loss).
One way to escape this is:
* You accept that the Hawkin radiation contains the original information.
* But it is scrambled in a reversible way, but so hard that you cannot reverse it with the energie available in the universe.
There are nice talk by Scott Aaronson about this, e.g.:
https://simons.berkeley.edu/events/theoretically-speaking-series-scott-aaronson https://simons.berkeley.edu/events/theoretically-speaking-se...
- lokedhs 6y agoBut Hawking radiation is black-body radiation. Isn't it just photons where its frequency is proportional to the black hole mass? Where would the information be encoded?