3 ms·
> It's extremely sales driven... and the systems you write are mostly for the benefit of insurance companies / compliance than doctors or patients. This. Once
by floatrock 6y ago
> It's extremely sales driven... and the systems you write are mostly for the benefit of insurance companies / compliance than doctors or patients.
This.
Once I worked making healthcare software that would basically save costs by avoiding complications. We were bidding into a large hospital network. After the long sales cycle, we checked the most boxes, clinicians liked the feel of ours the best, they said ours was the most intuitive, helped them do their job the fastest, etc.
The clinicians weren't the ones writing the check though.
Our competitor approached the main insurance provider in the area and convinced them they could save x% in additional claims if the hospital network would adopt their software. Competitor's deal was to split the bill between the insurance company and the hospital network. To the admins writing the checks, they had the choice between two vendors that more or less did the same thing but one came in at half the cost. Clinicians' preferences didn't matter, it was a no brainer for them.
No amount of software engineering would have saved that deal.
- duffpkg 6y agoI have seen in healthcare more "bribery" than in any other industry I've ever worked. Whether quasi-legal in the shape of various kickbacks to outright illegal gifts of cash and goods. It is sadly endemic to the industry. In part I think it happens more commonly because there is so much "other peoples money" in healthcare. Everyone is spending from someone elses checkbook and so transactions seem very distant.
- oogetyboogety 6y agoAccountable care models are the next step now that HMOs are widespread. restoring financial burden to the patient seems backwards when considering systems like universal healthcare, but ends up reducing inefficiency (identifying genuine surplus, not things that end up costing in the end like reducing preventative care)