3 ms·
>Yelp would not lose such a case. You don't know that. No one knows that. Having money doesn't magically mean automatically winning court battles.
by proverbialbunny 6y ago
>Yelp would not lose such a case.
You don't know that. No one knows that. Having money doesn't magically mean automatically winning court battles.
- whoisburbansky 6y agoNo but it does mean a higher chance that the legal battle ends up being protracted enough that the smaller party is forced to abandon their case because they can't afford legal fees anymore. Saying that having more money doesn't magically win court battles ignores the ways in which having deeper pockets lets you bog the other side down until they literally can't afford to keep fighting.
- dfxm12 6y agoIt's not magic. Yelp has already won at least one similar case [0]. And like a sibling commenter said, without enough money, you won't even get to court. 0 - http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/09/02/11-17676.pdf http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2014/09/02/11...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ponker 6y agoIf one player has millions and the other has billions, the poorer party can prevail. If one player has thousands and the other has millions, the larger player can just jam up the legal processes to make it virtually impossible to hold them to account.