3 ms·
> "Just because I'm in Atlanta doesn't make me inherently worth less than my peers in SF." Should a person be charged SF prices for groceries when they're livi
by ThrowawayR2 6y ago
> "Just because I'm in Atlanta doesn't make me inherently worth less than my peers in SF."
Should a person be charged SF prices for groceries when they're living in Atlanta because they're getting SF pay? Clearly not. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
- phamilton 6y ago> You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can if you have sufficient negotiating power.
- echelon 6y ago> Should a person be charged SF prices for groceries when they're living in Atlanta because they're getting SF pay? Your reasoning makes no sense. It's a choice to live in a city that lets landlords dictate which buildings can be built. Atlanta and other cities are unconstrained for new housing development. SF policies are a tax on its non-homeowner residents. You shouldn't be entitled to a differential just because your city doesn't build new housing fast enough. That has no bearing on the work your employees perform.
- paridhi7 6y agoThen, it should be fair for a person with 4 kids living in Atlanta to be paid more than someone without any kids living in SF, right? You clearly missed the entire point of the article.