4 ms·
Just for the record, Japan didn't attack pearl harbor to "demoralize" the US, they did it with the aim to fully decapitate the US Pacific fleet, and it almost w
by CyanBird 6y ago
Just for the record, Japan didn't attack pearl harbor to "demoralize" the US, they did it with the aim to fully decapitate the US Pacific fleet, and it almost worked if it weren't because US Pacific carriers were off to the sea at the time and not in the dock
Besides that, please don't do the dumb US jingoism, it is just so tiring overall
- notyourwork 6y agoDo you actually think NK would stand a chance against any of the major powers of today? I don't think this is anything about patriotism and simply stating facts. NK is not a world power and picking a fight with a world power won't end well.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- baryphonic 6y ago> Just for the record, Japan didn't attack pearl harbor to "demoralize" the US, they did it with the aim to fully decapitate the US Pacific fleet, and it almost worked... Hold on, it didn't "almost work." The carriers being out of port made the attack much worse for Japan, but the operation was a fairly dramatic strategic failure. Japan knew that the US industrial capacity at the time could produce new ships quickly, so the main aim was to buy time to gain a larger foothold in Asia that could withstand a total US war (especially because US strategy clearly regarded Germany as the bigger threat). The US Atlantic Fleet had four carriers at the time (Yorktown, Ranger, Wasp and Hornet); the Pacific Fleet had three (Enterprise, Lexington, Saratoga). Notice something about those names? Shortly after the US was attacked, the Yorktown and Hornet were transferred to the Pacific Fleet. After the Lexington was sunk in the Battle of the Coral Sea, the Wasp was also transferred. At the same time, new carriers were entering service in the US at a fairly quick rate. The Essex was commissioned in December 1942, and then the Essex-class Wasp, Yorktown and Hornet were all commissioned in 1943 (after the aforementioned were sunk in battle). Also, if you look at the tactical situation at Pearl Harbor, the Japanese bombers and torpedo aircraft were heavily biased in targeting lower-value battleships instead of the high-value cruisers and destroyers. Battleships had the prestige at the time, however, and pilots who knocked one out would receive greater glory than those who knocked out a more pedestrian destroyer or cruiser or even submarine. Finally, one of the aims of Japan was to undermine US morale. It may not have been the main strategic aim, but it was an explicit goal. In fact, that's often an aim of "decapitation" operations: sow chaos and prevent your enemy from organizing. So, no, it's not "US jingoism" to point out these fairly obvious facts. The US was simply better prepared for a conflict. It probably is today, too.