4 ms·
He doesn't have a way with words unless "being rude" now means "having a way with words". Furthermore, his statement is logically incorrect (the best kind of in
by blub 16y ago
He doesn't have a way with words unless "being rude" now means "having a way with words". Furthermore, his statement is logically incorrect (the best kind of incorrect): the sense of right and wrong is a general human trait, independent of race or culture. It can be altered by nurture, but it transcends it.
One can very well use it as an argument for why somebody else should or should not do something. e.g: One should not throw a hard-disk at Linus Torvalds because they might hurt him and that's just wrong...
- galactus 16y agoYou are being downvoted only because you are criticizing the god-like-status Linus Torvalds.
- javanix 16y agoNo, he is being downvoted for calling people who disagree with the following logically incorrect: The sense of right and wrong is a general human trait, independent of race or culture. It can be altered by nurture, but it transcends it. That sounds a lot like most theology I've heard, and I suspect that the HN crowd is not one that puts a whole lot of stock in theology.
- galactus 16y agoIf I understood right, he is just saying that moral capacity is innate. This seems to me pretty obvious.
- Raphael_Amiard 16y ago> the sense of right and wrong is a general human trait, independent of race or culture. If you're talking about the fact that every culture has notions of right and wrong, yeah sure. If you're saying that what is right and what is wrong is universal and not cultural ... Well where to begin Some of thoses traits are shared amongst most cultures (Murder is wrong, incest is wrong), but even there there are exceptions (ritual murder ?). For anything more complicated than that, this position is simply impossible to hold. Most precisely, about property, intellectual or physical, and things like profit, the sense of right and wrong varies so wildly amongst cultures that i can't really think you're making this argument seriously.
- blub 16y agoI'm saying that the notions of right and wrong come firstly from our human nature, secondly from our society and so on. Last in this list is ethics as personal preference or "something private" as Linus likes to call it. And even if it does vary wildly in current cultures, there is such a thing as a sense of morals that we can combine with rational thought to reach a fair solution. The fact that culture A considers ritual murder ok fails this morals + rational though test.
- aliguori 16y agoEven within a single culture, it varies widely. Just in the US, look at the opposing views toward capital punishment.
- javanix 16y agoWell, by Linus' definition I would say this sort of attitude falls directly under "sanctimonious dick-head".