> I just read that Pfizer reports its vaccine as 95% effective, even though pharmaceutical originally reported its vaccine as 90% effective I think, "originall

> I just read that Pfizer reports its vaccine as 95% effective, even though pharmaceutical originally reported its vaccine as 90% effective I think, "originally" is not the right term. "Pfizer’s Early Data Shows Vaccine Is More Than 90% Effective". Now more data is in, and it is indeed more than 90% effective, more like 95%. They already have sold the vaccine, and it won't be sold over the counter. I don't see any gain in telling to have 93%, 95% or 98% efficacy, if you don't have it.