4 ms·
I don't want them to focus on RISC-V. Only time will tell how appropriate RISC-V can be technologically in a smartphone application, and why would you want the
by nsajko 6y ago
I don't want them to focus on RISC-V. Only time will tell how appropriate RISC-V can be technologically in a smartphone application, and why would you want the company that focuses on open source to invest themselves into it? Are you aware that Riscv being an open ISA has absolutely nothing to do with open source (either software or hardware)?
- dahfizz 6y agoIf every compiler cost $1000 for every time you wanted to compile something, there would be dramatically less OSS. Having an open, free ISA _allows_ for open hardware.