4 ms·

> It seems self-evident that any extra would be mopped up by trees, bushes etc in the wild. This is factually incorrect. Please stop spreading lies. [0] You ar

> It seems self-evident that any extra would be mopped up by trees, bushes etc in the wild. This is factually incorrect. Please stop spreading lies. [0] You are absolutely failing to realise the rate at which we are pumping CO2, NO2 and SO2 and other gases into the atmosphere. > Did you know that some farms, pump carbon dioxide into their greenhouses to improve their crop. Did you know that humans are going to get cognitively impaired with the increasing CO2 concentrations? [1] [0] https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/05/plants-help-absorb-carbon-emissions-for-now/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/2019/05/plant... [1] https://www.colorado.edu/mechanical/2020/04/21/continued-co2-emissions-will-impair-cognition https://www.colorado.edu/mechanical/2020/04/21/continued-co2...

feralimal 6y ago
So much trust in the stories you are provided. Even though it doesn't tally up with what you see. I see a wonderful world. You see a world that you yourself are killing. But even accepting the stories, science etc we are given, the top 100 corporations are responsible on their own for 70% of the emissions. Why don't we make this issue completely disappear in the easiest way possible, by banning those corporations only from any polluting? Job done.
- DoingIsLearning 6y ago
  > But even accepting the stories, science etc we are given, the top 100 corporations are responsible on their own for 70% of the emissions. Why don't we make this issue completely disappear in the easiest way possible, by banning those corporations only from any polluting? Job done. Well on that we definitely have common ground, all you need now is a few spare million to form a political lobbying group. Bare in mind that much of that pollution is to make products/utilities that are then used by consumer. So it is still consumer driven pollution. But I absolutely agree on the principle that Government and Industry should be leading the Carbon emmisions reduction.
  - feralimal 6y ago
    Its so obvious, isn't it? Why hasn't anyone done it? Because that does not suit the agenda. Because government does not change anything, its just there to pacify the masses. Name one thing that government has done for you, when you voted? Lobbying is not the answer. You are dealing with a system that has been captured from top to bottom.

feralimal 6y ago

So much trust in the stories you are provided. Even though it doesn't tally up with what you see. I see a wonderful world. You see a world that you yourself are killing. But even accepting the stories, science etc we are given, the top 100 corporations are responsible on their own for 70% of the emissions. Why don't we make this issue completely disappear in the easiest way possible, by banning those corporations only from any polluting? Job done.

DoingIsLearning 6y ago
> But even accepting the stories, science etc we are given, the top 100 corporations are responsible on their own for 70% of the emissions. Why don't we make this issue completely disappear in the easiest way possible, by banning those corporations only from any polluting? Job done. Well on that we definitely have common ground, all you need now is a few spare million to form a political lobbying group. Bare in mind that much of that pollution is to make products/utilities that are then used by consumer. So it is still consumer driven pollution. But I absolutely agree on the principle that Government and Industry should be leading the Carbon emmisions reduction.
- feralimal 6y ago
  Its so obvious, isn't it? Why hasn't anyone done it? Because that does not suit the agenda. Because government does not change anything, its just there to pacify the masses. Name one thing that government has done for you, when you voted? Lobbying is not the answer. You are dealing with a system that has been captured from top to bottom.