> It doesn't make sense as being cultural because there plenty of real examples of effective writing that starts with what you are writing about. This is a non

> It doesn't make sense as being cultural because there plenty of real examples of effective writing that starts with what you are writing about. This is a non-argument. In the US, writing is considered effective if you put the bottom line up front. GP wrote that BLUFfing is considered offensive in their culture. Now you respond that lots of people like BLUFfing. Now you say it's not culture-dependent but a universal truth that BLUF is better. Well, other cultures disagree.