Great link, this is what everyone's looking for. There's quite a bit of data here, definitely over my head, but I think page 24 has details on the specificity

Great link, this is what everyone's looking for. There's quite a bit of data here, definitely over my head, but I think page 24 has details on the specificity and sensitivity via results of the clinical study. Screenshot of just that part: https://imgur.com/a/G5JVS2V https://imgur.com/a/G5JVS2V Edit: From the EUA itself (linked by someone else above), I find these conditions on their marketing to be hilarious: "No descriptive printed matter, advertising, or promotional materials, relating to the use of your product may represent or suggest that this test is safe or effective for the detection of SARS-CoV-2." Which is then immediately followed by (emphasis added): "Z. All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional materials, relating to the use of your product shall clearly and conspicuously state that: · This home test kit has not been FDA cleared or approved; · This home test kit has been authorized by FDA under an EUA; · This home test kit has been authorized only for the detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2, not for any other viruses or pathogens; and ..." Which is it -- authorized for the safe & effective detection of SARS-Cov-2, or authorized for sale but NOT safe and/or effective? Also, the EUA requires them to build a "results reporting website/portal" within 4-months. Idk, it sure seems like a non-zero amount of subjective bureaucracy to me.