One of the biggest problems the article points out more than anything is "Who's Going To Pay For It?" You have one of two options. The crowd-funded approach wo

One of the biggest problems the article points out more than anything is "Who's Going To Pay For It?" You have one of two options. The crowd-funded approach would have to come with an understanding that you're trying to build a better, more private search engine that will leave the payer paying for all those who don't and the payer won't be able to have a say in anything as we'd like search results to be flat and even across the board. That means if I search for Coronavirus results, not only do I get the goverment and "Official" sources, I should get everything that I'm looking for and refine as needed. The second approach is obviously big money but if you have big money coming in, big money will give You one of two options; Do as they say or they withdraw funding leaving you back at option one and having to downsize. Rocks and hard places people. Not much else you can do there. Unless you take a Pilled.net approach.