3 ms·
Technically, I think their problem is assuming that it's acceptable for there to be such a entity, not that one necessarily exists. And then misinterpreting/mis
by a1369209993 6y ago
Technically, I think their problem is assuming that it's acceptable for there to be such a entity, not that one necessarily exists. And then misinterpreting/misrepresenting git's semi-intentional exclusion of such a entity as a bug when in fact it's a feature.
- rakoo 6y agoThey don't think it's a bug, they think it's something that is desirable (and git might not be the right tool for the job)
- wpietri 6y agoI'm not sure that that such an entity is truly necessary to get a lot of the functionality. However, in the case of git, I'd guess 95% or more of users in effect do have a such an entity. Github is $7.5 billion worth of proof that most people are cool with effectively centralized source code management.