3 ms·
Hrm, I think it's extremely iffy to abbreviate South Australia like that in a search query. You don't need the "for" either. BTW, when I perform the same searc
by qiqitori 6y ago
Hrm, I think it's extremely iffy to abbreviate South Australia like that in a search query. You don't need the "for" either.
BTW, when I perform the same search, Google's first result is
"What Are the Lockdown Rules for South Africa? A Guide for ..." and all the other results on the first page are about South Africa too. (Note: I'm in Japan)
- nl 6y ago> Hrm, I think it's extremely iffy to abbreviate South Australia like that in a search query. Everyone in Australia uses "SA" - this is one of the reasons why location based context is important. > You don't need the "for" either. I worked on consumer search for a few years, and on text based search word like "for" are helpful to get exact match. Even if the term frequency of "for" on its own isn't particularly useful "for SA" absolutely is. (And these days with neural ranking using sub-word parts it is even more useful).
- JauntyHatAngle 6y agoSA is how all Australians would word that.