> In 50 years we'll see them in [..] scientific journal articles. I highly doubt this. Common shortcurts (such as "it's" for "it is") and dialect is still abse

> In 50 years we'll see them in [..] scientific journal articles. I highly doubt this. Common shortcurts (such as "it's" for "it is") and dialect is still absent from serious journals (unless it's the research target, of course) and I'm rather sure emojis will similarly be disregarded.