> That’s partly because the intellectual underpinning of the First Amendment was engineered for a simpler era. There's no engineering here. The Bill of Rights

> That’s partly because the intellectual underpinning of the First Amendment was engineered for a simpler era. There's no engineering here. The Bill of Rights are meant as enumerated inherent ("god-given") rights. They're not engineered for anything other than codifying the natural rights of people. His argument invokes the idea of a "marketplace of idea" and "truth" which essentially reduces natural rights to matters of utility, when they're more of a moral declaration that free people can speak.