4 ms·
I don't understand that argument at all. What's the threat model? I think it's entirely reasonable to be in the following posture: I want as much privacy for m
by bscphil 6y ago
I don't understand that argument at all. What's the threat model?
I think it's entirely reasonable to be in the following posture: I want as much privacy for my web searches as I can reasonably achieve without having to run a search engine myself. I'm willing to trust that search providers are not saving personally identifiable information or passively turning over search data to law enforcement if they claim that they are not in their terms of service.
That's pretty much the use case for DDG. With Bing you know they are violating your privacy. With DDG you have a promise in writing that they are not. It's hard to see how that's not strictly better than what you get from Bing if privacy is among your core desiderata.
- pb7 6y agoI think we're on the same page. I was saying that if it were to be discovered that DDG lacks privacy then there would be no reason to use it over Bing since that is its raison d'etre. >I'm willing to trust that search providers are not saving personally identifiable information or passively turning over search data to law enforcement if they claim that they are not in their terms of service. Do other search companies disclose that they share data with the FBI, NSA, etc in their ToS? Genuinely don't know.