4 ms·
I don't think it's that obvious, and I don't think it's about one's capability of moving. Otherwise every wealthy city would be dying. This just looks like San
by tolbish 6y ago
I don't think it's that obvious, and I don't think it's about one's capability of moving. Otherwise every wealthy city would be dying.
This just looks like San Francisco isn't a very livable city outside of a few specific interests.
- BrianOnHN 6y agoI suppose you "live there" and have "a lot more data points." Even so, I'm going to bet on Occam's razor for this one.
- tolbish 6y agoWait I thought my point was based on Occam's razor.
- whimsicalism 6y ago> every wealthy city would be dying Sincere question: what cities of comparable or larger size are considered as wealthy as San Francisco? Manhattan (not a city)?
- tolbish 6y agoTokyo, London, Hong Kong, and Paris are all probably far more wealthy and do not seem to be dying.
- whimsicalism 6y ago> Tokyo, London, Hong Kong, and Paris are all probably far more wealthy All four of those cities have average incomes less than SF, and all but Paris are less than half that of SF.