4 ms·
As a millennial whose only chatting activities are confined to irc and doesn’t really get emojis — could someone please articulate this phenomenon in terms that
by pen2l 6y ago
As a millennial whose only chatting activities are confined to irc and doesn’t really get emojis — could someone please articulate this phenomenon in terms that would be meaningful to me?
I’ve seen sentences sometimes where words are actually replaced with emojis... is this how some subset of people actually communicate online or that’s just for some effect of irony?
- hprotagonist 6y agoironic effect is, of course, communication all by itself. My use of emoji in messaging applications is primarily limited to quick rebus-like reaction replies to meme images, a quick and dirty reaction to a message in slack expressing some vague emotional response, or making complicated fart-jokes with my partner that rely on a lot of out of band information. (i also use IRC on the daily, and have been known to use emoji there too, so these communication forms are not disjoint)
- eat_veggies 6y agoIt can be a way of adding intonation and other affective, out-of-band communication back into text. I never really see people use them purely to replace words one-for-one. But interspersed throughout a message, emojis can, as you say, add irony, but also communicate that a message that could be taken as ironic isn't, or communicate some other subtext. Text is a flattening of speech, and emojis can add some of those missing dimensions back -- and, like our IRL verbal cues, tics, and gestures, they can be hard to decode if you're not "in" on the game.
- zck 6y ago> I never really see people use them purely to replace words one-for-one. This article does that. Here it might be more often than the author would normally do, but I've seen things like that non-ironically. > To stay relevant in the age of social media you had to support emoji or you were in the . EDIT: HN stripped the emoji. The end of that sentence was "or you were :skull: in the :droplet:", read as "or you were dead in the water".
- lovegoblin 6y ago> Here it might be more often than the author would normally do, but I've seen things like that non-ironically. Maybe not ironically, but doing that definitely adds informality - exactly the kind of out-of-band context that GP is talking about.
- 542458 6y agoIMHO it’s a few things: It’s an ingroup signal, indicating (by “correctly” using emoji) that you’re part of a specific subculture to the recipient. “Praying_emojii flame_emojii YASS” indicates to me that the writer is young and hip. “Do you want to have a BBQ bbq_emojii ?” says to me that the writer is older and less hip. It can be hard to communicate tone through writing. Emojis allow one to instantly mark a piece of writing as informal/non-serious with minimal effort. This includes irony - “eggplant_emojii” is often a non-serious reply indicating that “I am jokingly acting like this this is sexual or attractive” It’s a proxy for longer writing. “Thumbsup_emoji” is a substitute for some marginally harder to articulate feelings of “looks good / I like it” Of course, there are many subcultures that use emoji in different ways and as proxies for other things as well. At a previous employer we’d often just send “taco_emoji?” to ask who was buying lunch. It’s the sort of thing that can be used/abused in many different ways.
- lovegoblin 6y agoI really strongly recommend 'Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language' by Grechen McCulloch. It's a lighthearted linguistic look at how our written communication has changed over the last couple decades since the advent of mainstream internet access.
- ziml77 6y agoI've only seen this on Twitter and assumed it was to fit posts within the character limit.