I don't want it and I don't recommend it to my peers. I also don't think DNS-based content blocking is really as popular as the PiHole community would say. I us

I don't want it and I don't recommend it to my peers. I also don't think DNS-based content blocking is really as popular as the PiHole community would say. I use client-side content blocking like uBO instead, which I imagine is overwhelmingly the more common solution, and it is also more powerful and effective (and easier to use). UK ISPs having mandatory DNS blocking is a great example of why DoH is important. The user should decide what they want, not the network operator. Perhaps widespread use of encryption technologies means I can't do content blocking on proprietary appliances like the Chromecast for example. I think that's a necessary evil and I just won't buy such an appliance if it's that big of a problem. Only legislation can really fix that kind of problem anyway, it doesn't really matter whether Firefox implements DoH or not.