3 ms·
>Could git have named some commands better? Yes, of course. If you don't know what git is doing internally on a checkout, it makes little sense. But this is bei
by thrwyoilarticle 6y ago
>Could git have named some commands better? Yes, of course. If you don't know what git is doing internally on a checkout, it makes little sense. But this is being worked on.
Sadly these improvements rarely make it into the public consciousness because people don't pay attention to them and instead find stale or inappropriate StackOverflow solutions.