3 ms·
Your phrasing is definitely a better initial starting point. I do think that my phrasing has its place if a non-answer is given after the second or third time.
by tareqak 6y ago
Your phrasing is definitely a better initial starting point. I do think that my phrasing has its place if a non-answer is given after the second or third time.
Your follow-up questions are great too.
This sort of dialog / FAQ for “what do you have to hide” needs to be available somewhere online with a catchy URI e.g. https://privacymatters.org https://privacymatters.org (I don’t know if this is real just an example).
- Folcon 6y agoDefinitely agree that your stronger take is needed if people say none. But that's why in my opinion, a question about what society people are looking to live in is important. We can start to draw out what people are and aren't comfortable with. Personally I think that in addition to websites, more media needs to be available for the public to discuss this topic more and get a feel for it. EG: Mr Robot raised some questions about whether the hacking and casual discovery of personal information they were showing was realistic. Perhaps "Man in the High Castle", I've not seen it, so not sure if it covers the notion of the nation state turning hostile and then leveraging collected information to attack specific citizens, but something along those lines. Also things like the munk debates to foster discussion. In my experience media does a much better job of getting people to empathise with different circumstances which would get them really thinking what these things might mean for them.