4 ms·
>But Qira performs these tasks as well. Qira doesn't seem to have diasm graph, fn call graph, hex editor, decompiler, etc. >It's more minimal, that's all and
by arebhaibhai 6y ago
>But Qira performs these tasks as well.
Qira doesn't seem to have diasm graph, fn call graph, hex editor, decompiler, etc.
>It's more minimal, that's all and it's personal preference.
Totally understand and for that you should have a look at radare (https://radare.org/n/radare2.html https://radare.org/n/radare2.html)
>You didn't need to downvote this lol. Take a little criticism.
I'm sure I didn't as I'm new to HN and somehow don't see downvote option. This was not a criticism tbh, more like a misunderstanding and it's fine.
- tr1ll10nb1ll 6y agoSure, I'll have a look at radare.
- moonchild 6y agoRadare2 isn't any more minimal than cutter. Cutter contains all the same components as r2, it just layers a GUI on top of them. (I find the conflation of minimalness with elaborateness of GUI a bit amusing. Like when people say that xterm is more minimal than gnome-terminal, when in fact the two have similar featuresets and xterm is if anything more bloated.)