2 ms·
58 percent (closer to 59 percent in fact) can only be described as a blowout. Maybe if they spent less it would simply have been closer. Meg Whitman spent some
by unishark 6y ago
58 percent (closer to 59 percent in fact) can only be described as a blowout. Maybe if they spent less it would simply have been closer.
Meg Whitman spent something like $180M for the governor's race, and still lost badly. You can't sell voters something they don't want to buy.
- SilasX 6y agoOkay but the less of a difference (you're claiming) it made, the more (it means) they had to pay per vote. So like, if it was going to be 55% in-favor regardless, then they only "bought" 3% of voters, which would mean having paid $23.98 * 58/(58-55)= $463/vote.