3 ms·
> "if it's in the AGB (terms of service) good luck arguing/defending" It might be hard to argue without suing, but legally there are provisions that if the AGB
by mfsch 6y ago
> "if it's in the AGB (terms of service) good luck arguing/defending"
It might be hard to argue without suing, but legally there are provisions that if the AGB contain “surprising” terms, you have to be made specifically aware of them or they are invalid. There is currently a high-stakes case building because of this: Some of the epidemics insurances for restaurants had a provision that “pandemics” are excluded and won’t pay out for COVID-19, now restaurants are suing.
https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/epidemie-versicherer-kein-geld-trotz-praemie-wirte-klagen-gegen-epidemie-versicherer https://www.srf.ch/news/schweiz/epidemie-versicherer-kein-ge...
- nix23 6y agoThe whole Swiss government is insurer friendly/best buddy, since last year the insurer can change the contract on his side without you to have to accept it...it's disgusting. Also the lobby is really big...even bigger then the financial lobby: https://www.nau.ch/politik/bundeshaus/so-viel-geld-pumpen-schweizer-firmen-in-die-politik-65596012 https://www.nau.ch/politik/bundeshaus/so-viel-geld-pumpen-sc... And that is the real interesting graphic: https://c.nau.ch/i/RNNxO/1360/spenden.jpg https://c.nau.ch/i/RNNxO/1360/spenden.jpg