3 ms·
Well, it’s an interesting perspective you have. Worthy of consideration. It’s an idea that swims against the tide, as all of the objective third-party security
by jb1991 6y ago
Well, it’s an interesting perspective you have. Worthy of consideration. It’s an idea that swims against the tide, as all of the objective third-party security researchers and antivirus companies that I’ve been reading seem to disagree with your assessment here. But thanks for sharing.
- saurik 6y agoPlease read this entire series of tweets, which starts off looking unrelated but is actually entirely focused on this topic. It was written by me--someone very famous in the security field--and I don't know if anyone in said field who disagreed with the Apple/security sentiments... that Apple was better than Android at malware issues ended 2-3 years ago. https://mobile.twitter.com/saurik/status/1295024384596312064 https://mobile.twitter.com/saurik/status/1295024384596312064
- jb1991 6y agoThose tweets make some valid points but it seems like a different topic than what we’ve been discussing. I guess I failed to see the connection to this particular issue.
- saurik 6y agoThe culminating moment of all of the security researcher hostility discussion was "The reality is that Apple has been so hostile to independent security research that they've lost their edge: exploits for Android now cost more than exploits for iOS, a reversal experts generally credit to Google correctly allowing researchers open access." https://www.wired.com/story/android-zero-day-more-than-ios-zerodium/ https://www.wired.com/story/android-zero-day-more-than-ios-z...