No one, not even the supposed originators or the terms or the ideas, knows or can agree on what OOP even is or means. So when codebases coded in the ubiquitous

No one, not even the supposed originators or the terms or the ideas, knows or can agree on what OOP even is or means. So when codebases coded in the ubiquitous "OOP" style, (essentially procedural code full or state, mutation, temporal dependencies, side effects, exceptions and other things which make it impossible to reason about what's going on) are full of defects, the advocates can always claim it's because it's because it's not Real, True Object Oriented Programming.