3 ms·
It is not a fair comparison since 4900HS is a 35w chip. A fair comparison would be 4750U, 15w chip with score of 1184/8008
by sally1620 6y ago
It is not a fair comparison since 4900HS is a 35w chip. A fair comparison would be 4750U, 15w chip with score of 1184/8008
- Avi-D-coder 6y agoI'm not comparing on the basis of TDP. I'm comparing performance/dollar. I fully expect Apple's higher end, higher TDP chips to achieve better performance. But they will cost more money. Like it or not the M1 is competing in a price bracket with the 4900HS.
- nardras 6y agobut you will agree that - for a mobile cpu - power consumption and therefore battery life is an important aspect of the equation?
- cbozeman 6y agoIs it though? A "Pro" laptop has, by the very name, an implication of performance. I don't know many professionals in any industry that are constrained so heavily by power - generally when you're doing professional work, you're not far from an outlet, save some rare use cases like on-location shoots for film and television.
- Avi-D-coder 6y agoAbsolutely, that's one of the reasons I may buy a first generation Apple product.