I am so tired of this line of argument. Those are totally arbitrary suggestions without any consideration for what is practical or legally plausible. On what b

I am so tired of this line of argument. Those are totally arbitrary suggestions without any consideration for what is practical or legally plausible. On what basis should website owners lose their right to determine what goes up on their own website? What about the creative control one's own work? What about free speech for the site creator? What about the property rights owned to those paying cash to keep the site operational? The law should not attempt to dictate the specific ways in which it is legal for computer programs to sort information for display on a website... this is absurd.