6 ms·
Some people have argued that hospitals are skewing the numbers to inflate the number of people that are dying of Covid-19 vs other causes, or that these are peo
by tcbawo 6y ago
Some people have argued that hospitals are skewing the numbers to inflate the number of people that are dying of Covid-19 vs other causes, or that these are people that would died anyways. Neither of these arguments are supported by the FT data. To be fair, it's not clear how to quantify people that might be dying due to lockdown-related causes (eg. suicide, untreated health issues), but this appears to be smaller than Covid-19 deaths.
Edit: I'm curious why this is getting downvoted.
- drivebycomment 6y agoI didn't downvote, but I can see why. It seems like you didn't read the FT graph. It's showing the total death rates in a graph, and during initial spike in COVID, Sweden showed 20% increase during the peak. By definition, there's no "skewing" possible, since it's all death - unless you're claiming hospitals are making up death. If your main point is that reported death due to COVID might be inflated, sure, that's possible but that doesn't mean there's no increase due to COVID related death. If you want to point out the reported number due to COVID might be slightly higher than it really is, you should at least acknowledge that there is meaningful and substantial increase in death due to COVID as there absolutely is. By omitting that, your post can't be distinguished from someone posting with a conspiracy mindset and ignoring actual data on substantial increase in death.
- tcbawo 6y agoClearly, I must not have articulated myself well enough, since you took away the exact opposite of my point: I have heard the suggestion of inflated death numbers within the US in casual conversation multiple times and I frequently refer to this specific article as a counterargument. Fwiw - I have been a subscriber to the FT for ages and I've followed that chart (which is free to all) since the beginning.
- dboreham 6y agoThe inflated death numbers thing is Fox News disinformation.
- bnralt 6y agoI think you're post was pretty clear. "Some people argue that X, but the data doesn't support X." Sometimes there can be a tendency for people to skim posts and try to quickly box people into Team A or Team B. It's not unlikely that some people read your first sentence (or even the first half of your first sentence) and pegged you for having a particular position without paying attention to the whole thing.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- seppin 6y ago> Some people have argued that hospitals are skewing the numbers to inflate the number of people that are dying of Covid-19 vs other causes This is a common theory in the US as well, where the accusation of "they are doing it for money" is most repeated. It's ridiculous and untrue, but that's the logic here. What could even a theoretical justification for hospitals inflating numbers in a fully government-run system ?
- kevinpet 6y agoI'll be briefer than the other reply. The FT excess mortality graph doesn't care whether anything is flagged as a COVID death or not. If there's a lethal pandemic, you don't need to rely on doctors classifying deaths, you can see it in the total number of deaths from all causes.
- jobigoud 6y agoThat's exactly what they are saying.
- furyofantares 6y agoI think you're being downvoted because it can be confusing sometimes when someone replies to a post in agreement, it's much more natural on the internet for replies to be a disagreement. This makes it really easy to read your first sentence as something you are proposing rather than referencing, which makes the whole post rather confusing if not read more carefully.