There are many reports of high compliance. E.g. https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-coronavirus-lessons/ https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-coronavirus-l

There are many reports of high compliance. E.g. https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-coronavirus-lessons/ https://www.politico.eu/article/sweden-coronavirus-lessons/ "93 percent of the population say they are following social-distancing recommendations." Maybe compliance has waned since. I don't know. Here's a typical narrative that illustrates why we should be more careful about the word "lockdown": Alex: "Sweden has successfully managed COVID19 without a lockdown." Bob: "Great, so we should just go and live our normal lives then." Alex: "Actually no. We need to cut off most social contact, ban visitors to rest homes, and work from home when possible." Bob: "Er, that sounds like a lockdown to me!" Alex: "WELL ACTUALLY it's not a lockdown as long as the government doesn't assert the legal authority to enforce these restrictions." Bob: "... but the effects on health, well-being and the economy will be the same as a lockdown?" Alex: "If everyone complies, which we expect them to, then yes, but the important thing is that we don't call it a lockdown."