5 ms·
The main thing is whether this cpu will throttle under load. All intel Cpus will throttle badly in Macbook like form factors.
by rowanG077 6y ago
The main thing is whether this cpu will throttle under load. All intel Cpus will throttle badly in Macbook like form factors.
- ericpauley 6y agoPer the tweets, this is a 10min test, so we'd probably see the effects of throttling at that point.
- rowanG077 6y agoCinebench only stresses the CPU not the GPU or the AI coprocessor. Besides I find these scores pretty dissapointing after all the hype. Yes it's faster then an i7-1165G in multicore but actually slower in single core. Slower... After all that hype.
- my123 6y agoThis is a score on macOS 11.0.0, which shipped with the hardware, 11.0.1 bumps clocks a bit to 3.2GHz, which makes Apple Silicon take the ST crown by a hair.
- roseway4 6y agoYou’re comparing a low-power CPU used in Apple’s low-end MacOS devices to a state of the art (released Q3 2020) high-end 28W TDP CPU from Intel.
- rowanG077 6y agoI'm comparing the M1 to a cpu that would have been used in a Macbook pro 13 if it weren't for the M1 soc. The current i7 intel Macbook pro 13 inch has the 1068NG7 model. Which is in fact a better cpu then the 1065g. Which is last gens 1165g. So I think this comparison is completely valid.
- fvdessen 6y agoBut it is 28 watts to the M1's 10 watts
- rowanG077 6y agoTrue, in perf per watt M1 does an incredible job I'd wager. But I'm not interested in that. I simply want the highest performance in a 13 inch formfactor. Apple marketing material said the M1 would blow everything out of the water with a HUGE margin. Now it turns out it's actually slower then their own laptop would be with a refreshed intel chip. That's what dissapoints me.
- alwillis 6y agoApple's marketing material said the M1 would blow everything out of the water with a HUGE margin. Could you provide a link to the marketing material that says the M1 would blow everything out of the water with a HUGE margin? The M1 press release says "The World’s Best CPU Performance per Watt". That's true. The M1 MacBook press release says "And with M1, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is up to 3x faster than the best-selling Windows laptop in its class." The fine print: Testing conducted by Apple in October 2020 using preproduction 13-inch MacBook Pro systems with Apple M1 chip, as well as production Intel Core i7-based PC systems with Intel Iris Plus Graphics and the latest version of Windows 10 available at the time of testing. Best-selling system based on publicly available sales data over the last nine months. Translation: those laptops you see at Best Buy that are in the $800–$1200 range? Yeah, we blows those things out the water. By a lot.
- roseway4 6y agoIf we’re comparing low-end apples to apples, the bottom-end Intel MacBook Pro (MacBookPro16,3) has an i5 part (Coffee Lake 8257U)[1] and would be a better comparison. I don’t think I’ve seen any indication from Apple the current M1 13” is all we’re going to see in this form factor. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro
- 6y ago
- joakleaf 6y agoApparently, it is a 10 min run: https://twitter.com/mnloona48_/status/1328460198860656642?s=20 https://twitter.com/mnloona48_/status/1328460198860656642?s=...
- name99 6y agoWe know the answer to that. The result you quote (7500 MT) is MBP. Light fan, audible but not too bad. Power consumed probably around 15W, but we'll have to wait for serious measurement. For MBA (no fan. passive cooling) same ST number, MT number is 6300. So fall off, but not that bad, large cores at maybe 80% of peak. Device gets slightly warm, not hot, under this use case. Device power maybe 8..9 W I would guess?