2 ms·

> Why? Well one part is incompetence. And the other is that a fall spike was just a hypothesis. We didn't know for sure.

• landemva 6y ago
  Seems we can agree that it was incompetent to prevent healthy people from seroconverting last summer.
  • VectorLock 6y ago
    With even healthy people dying or having long term if not life long health impacts, was it really "incompetent" to prevent people from taking those risks?
  • tunesmith 6y ago
    There's a counterfactual logic flaw there though. How do you know ahead of time that a healthy person would recover nicely? There are plenty of counterexamples. If you respond in a utilitarian manner, well then you have to compare it with other utilitarian approaches.
  • fxtentacle 6y ago
    Your sentence makes very little sense to me because the seroconversion has a high chance of causing life-altering side effects. I'd say it would be irresponsible to suggest that to the general public.